Archive for the ‘Newspapers’ Category

Newspapers, e-readers a natural fit

Tuesday, October 12th, 2010

It’s not surprising that the same adults affluent enough to buy an e-reader, such as a Kindle or Nook, also still read newspapers.

“Scarborough Research found that fully 78 percent of adults in so-called ‘e-reader households,’ which number about 4 million, read a newspaper in print or online within the past week,” Editor & Publisher says. “That compares with 71 percent of all adults. E-reader households are 11 percent more likely to read a newspaper regularly than an average adult.”

Adults in e-reader households are also 9 percent percent more likely than all adults nationally to have read a printed newspaper during the past week, and 48 percent more likely than all consumers nationally to have visited a newspaper website within the past month.

“E-reader devices are becoming an important technology for millions of Americans, and our data confirms their emergence as a natural companion to newspapers,” said Gary Meo, senior vice president of digital media and newspaper services for Scarborough Research. “At this point, many newspaper publishers are determining strategies for making their content available on e-reader devices, and this is creating a new opportunity to monetize content and increase readership.”

Charlotte Observer tries 3D in paper, online

Saturday, October 9th, 2010

The Charlotte Observer goes 3D Sunday with its special section for the beginning of race week at Charlotte Motor Speedway and will follow up with a 3D photo in the paper every day next week, editor Rick Thames explained Thursday.

The Sunday paper will come with 3D glasses for viewing racing photos in the paper and online at CharlotteObserver.com and That’sRacin.com.

“Our sports and photo staffs sifted through hundreds of great racing moments from our archives for this 20-page section, Thames said. “It includes legendary drivers, faithful fans, grinding competition on the track and furious action in the pits.”

The Observer’s director of  photography, Bert Fox, said editors looked for depth, action and simplicity. “As 3D images, foreground objects come at you and background objects fall off,” Fox said. “In the photos, race cars stretch far into the background, a pit crew looks like they’ll jump into your lap, drivers jump in the arms of race fans and helicopters fly off the page.”

And, since readers will have the glasses, Thames said, they figured they should give them more to look at from Charlotte and the region throughout the week.

Ad revenue high on medical marijuana

Wednesday, October 6th, 2010

Alternative newspapers and mainstream metropolitan dailies are cashing in on medical marijuana, the New York Times says.

“It is hard to measure what share of the overall market they account for, but ads for medical marijuana providers and the businesses that have sprouted up to service them — tax lawyers, real estate agents, security specialists — have bulked up papers in large metropolitan news markets like Los Angeles, San Francisco and Denver,” the newspaper said Tuesday.

The Obama administration said last fall that it would not prosecute users and suppliers of the drug as long as they complied with state laws. Fourteen states and the District of Columbia make legal allowances for medical marijuana, the Times says.

Demand is so large that newspapers are publishing supplemental guides to medical marijuana with titles like “Chronic-le,”  which had 48 pages for its summer issue,  “The Rolling Paper” and “ReLeaf,” also 48 pages last week

Scott Tobias, president and chief operating officer of Village Voice Media, which publishes alternative weeklies across the country, said that in Denver, money from advertising for marijuana-related businesses has totaled 15 percent of the weekly Westword’s revenue this year and nearly 40 percent of its classified advertising revenue.

At The Missoula (Montana) Independent, medical marijuana advertising now makes up about 10 percent of the paper’s revenue.

Print can’t even market itself well, Shafer says

Friday, October 1st, 2010

Jack Shafer, media critic for Slate, is not so impressed with the Newspaper Association of America ad campaign aimed at persuading advertisers that newspapers remain a viable marketing medium.

The ads are “so bad I can imagine advertisers interpreting it as the newspaper industry’s no-confidence vote in itself,” Shafer says. “Nobody would blame advertisers if they looked at the NAA ad and used it as an excuse to pull their buys from … papers.”

A second campaign for magazines that the Magazine Publishers of America recently claimed is working also fails to impress Shafer, though he doesn’t explain specifically why.

“If anybody understands how to make a print advertisement that really, really works, it should be newspaper and magazine people,” Shafer says. “But these two campaigns are so bumbling, so unpersuasive, so dull, that you’ve got to wonder whether any advertising intelligence went into making them. Maybe the goal was to sell the newspaper and magazine businesses as outposts of the desperate and pitiful worthy of advertiser charity. If so, Clios all around.”

Local advertisers to spend less with newspapers

Tuesday, September 21st, 2010

One in four local businesses surveyed across 40 states say they plan to cut back on newspaper advertising, Alan Mutter says on his Reflections of a Newsosaur blog. Instead they’ll spend more on web, social and mobile media.

The survey is by ITZBelden in conjunction with the American Press Institute.

When advertisers were asked where they planned to target their marketing dollars in 2010, the average allocation for newspapers was 23 percent,” Mutter says. “While this percentage would leave newspapers as the dominant local medium in most places, it is well below the 35 percent-plus market share that publishers enjoyed in the pre-Internet era.”

The poll indicates local advertisers will spend 13 percent of their ad budgets this year on digital media, giving digital media “the second-largest share of the dollars spent on advertising in a typical market, surpassing such traditional rivals as direct mail, television and the Yellow Pages.”

Newspapers can’t afford to lose retail advertisers, he says. “One potentially powerful way for newspapers to reassert their relevance to advertisers is by establishing themselves as experts in the growing array of digital media that merchants are hoping to use to lure customers to their businesses.”

Mutter has lots more at the link above.

Washington Post gives in on 1A advertising

Tuesday, September 14th, 2010

The Washington Post will join the growing trend among American newspapers of running front-page advertising when it publishes a display ad at the bottom of 1A next Sunday, Michael Calderone writes in Yahoo’s The Upshot blog.

The Post previewed the move last Sunday with an A-section spadea – a single-fold advertisement wrapped around the section – sponsored by Capital One that covered half of the front and all of the back of the section in D.C.-metro editions. It was a first for the newspaper.

“[T]he Post has been something of a holdout from the general embrace of front-page newspaper ads, as advertising revenue has sharply dropped for all print publications in recent years,” Calderone says. “Several major newspapers now run front-page display ads, including the Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, and the New York Times — with the latter paper starting to run front-page ads just last year.”

The Post’s first dip into the water will be a 2-inch high banner at the bottom of the page.

McClatchy newspapers, including The News & Observer in Raleigh and the Charlotte Observer, routinely run 1A ads across the bottom of the page, as well as removable stickers with advertising at the top of the front page.

For generations newspapers have avoided running advertising on the front page because doing so indicated the newspaper’s voice and identity, and thus its credibility, were for sale.

“But harsh economic struggles have forced newspaper companies to get more creative when it comes to generating revenue,” Calderone says. “And with its inaugural front-page ad scheduled for next Sunday, the Post is showing that it’s no exception.”

New York Times publisher concedes end to print

Thursday, September 9th, 2010

Publisher Arthur Sulzberger said this week the New York Times will no longer appear in print – someday.

Sulberger’s concession to what some call the obvious is a first, according to Henry Blodget in Business Insider, and no small idea.

Loss of print will require restructuring or downsizing the whole company or finding an underwriter (like, say, Mexican tycoon Carlos Slim). “The economics of the online news business will not support the infrastructure or newsroom that the printed paper supports,” he says.

“Importantly, even a successful online paywall will not allow the paper to maintain its current cost structure,” Blodget writes. If they pull in 1 million subscribers at $100 each they could meet current costs, assuming no loss in ad revenue.

The New York Times is due to introduce a “metered” paywall in early 2011. Readers will be allowed to access a certain number of articles free each month, then will be asked to pay.

What Sulzberger said in an interview mostly about the paywall with Emma Heald at Editors Weblog was that “we will stop printing the New York Times sometime in the future, date TBD.”

Newspaper ads show nine months of recovery

Wednesday, September 8th, 2010

The falloff of newspaper ad spending appears to be moderating, the Newspaper Association of America says, with a decline of 5.6 percent recorded in the second quarter this year compared to last, the third quarter in a row with a smaller year-to-year loss.

Through 2009, the deficit was 29 percent in the second quarter, then 27.9 percent and 23.7 percent in the final three months, Market Watch says. Then this year started with a drop of only 9.7 percent.

Meanwhile, online ad spending rose by 14 percent, following 5 percent growth in the first quarter and declines during each quarter of 2009.

USAT moves toward mobile, business interests

Monday, August 30th, 2010

USA Today, the nation’s second largest newspaper, has announced its most significant changes since its 1982 debut as it de-emphasizes print and ramps up availability via mobile devices. The move will include the elimination of  about 130 jobs and a breach of the church/state divide between news and business interests.

For starters, the newspaper will no longer have separate managing editors overseeing its News, Sports, Money and Life sections. “The newsroom instead will be broken up into a cluster of  ‘content rings’ each headed up by editors who will be appointed later this year,” the Associated Press says. The paper’s current Life ME will be executive editor of content.

USA Today’s restructuring will “usher in a new way of doing business that aligns sales efforts with the content we produce,” according to a slide show presented to USA Today’s staff, which The AP obtained.

The executive editor of content will have a “collaborative relationship” with USA Today’s newly appointed vice president of business development, according to one slide.

The paper will “focus less on print … and more on producing content for all platforms (Web, mobile, iPad and other digital formats),” the slide show said.

The AP says USA Today’s circulation has fallen from 2.3 million in 2007 to an average of 1.83 million during the six months ending in March. Advertising has fallen by about 50 percent between 2006 and the quarter ending this past June.

Here’s the news release.

How newspapers are – and aren’t – diversifying

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Media critic Alan Mutter uses a McClatchy newspaper as the negative example in a post on his Newsosaur blog about how large newspaper publishers are diversifying to survive in the new media world.

“While papers like the Kansas City Star continue to pursue the traditional model of publishing only the main title and a free once-a-week advertising product sent to the homes of non-subscribers, the ABC [Audit Bureau of Circulations] reports that papers like the Chicago Tribune and Dallas Morning News have created such a wide variety of products that the flagship paper produces just 56 percent of the average weekday circulation in each of their respective markets,” Mutter writes.

As circulations fall, “foresighted publishers are creating niche products to try to capture readers who historically were unlikely to buy the legacy newspaper – and, of course, the advertisers who covet them as customers,” he adds.

The Tribune and Morning News both publish periodicals aimed at young adults and those who prefer to read Spanish-language publications. The Tribune also publishes a free tabloid written by and for teenagers, and the Morning News delivers a free, weekly TMC, or total-market-coverage, advertising product, like many McClatchy papers produce.

Mutter predicts that the once flagship, general interest newspaper will eventually become simply one product among several niche publications that successful publishers produce.